Category: Rants

WordPress @ Slicehost

March 26, 2009

So I finally moved this blog from a shared-hosting with Godaddy to Slicehost 256MB VPS slice running Ubuntu Hardy . The whole process of setting up DNS and installing Apache, MySql, Postfix and WordPress (including my favourite theme and plugins) was very easy, and I didnt run into any problems. I did back up my database with Godaddy before migration, but the ‘Export/Import as XML’ seemed to work just fine. All in all, I was able to get it up and running in about an hour with all the content migrated. When there are documents like and Slicehost Articles, you really don’t have anything left to think.

With that saying, I really wanted to get rid of WordPress this time, or any other WordPress wannabes. WordPress is an awesome piece of software, but it’s just not what I ideally would like to have.

1. WordPress isn’t really suited for posting long snippets of code. If you want to get it working, you end up spending some time trying to fix those endcoding, line wraps and syntax highlighting issues.

2. WordPress is just too big for me. I don’t need those fancy features.

3. I don’t need databases to store some handful rants of mine. Ideally, I would like to write a blog in a text file (using some basic markup), and then just FTP it to my sever to a specific directory, and it would just work. The day I don’t want to have a blog anymore, I would just grab that directory from my server and take it with me.

4. Everytime I see a cool plugin or a theme I wanna try, I don’t want to be looking into every single line of code to see if there is anything malicious in there.

5. Every time I hear about any new vulnerability found in WordPress, I don’t want to be worried about doing an upgrade.

I did briefly go through the major blogging and some wiki softwares but they are all built around the same philosophy and more or less suffer from the same problems. At one point, I almost went with Webby (static site-generator based on Ruby), but then I would have to go through a separate plugin for comments like Disqus, which I didn’t want.

So eventually I had to decide between writing my own basic blogging software or using WordPress. I chose the latter, coz I think there are things way more important to do in the world than writing your own blogging software in 2009. Well, thats might be just another way saying that I am a loser.


February 18, 2009

Imagine what would happen to the earth, if the sun was suddenly shut down for like 10 minutes (by some cosmic force). I guess the earth would be wrapped up in ice within instants, and most forms of life would be extinct within minutes. (Now some intellectually and morally bankrupt Hollywood filmmaker will steal this original imagination of mine from my blog and make a science fiction movie out of it, without any due to me. But thats not what I am worried about right now.)

We normally take the sun for granted.

I did a little research. If we are able to trap all the solar energy falling onto the surface of earth for 3 minutes, it will solve all energy needs of the world for the next 25 years.

If the above is true, then how do you justify the $600 billion and 4000 American lives (Iraqis don’t have a life. So lets not count theirs) lost during the Oil-War in Iraq? I wonder how many barrels of oil on average is a soldier that dies equivalent to. And I wonder how many years of solar energy (or any other alternative energy for that matter) is that $600 billion equivalent to.

Erlang – overhyped or underestimated?

November 14, 2008

Erlang is like an exotic beautiful woman with no dressing sense.

I came across Erlang about a year ago. It is a language of a kind – precise, crafted and powerful. Its been there for about two decades now, and people have been using it for serious real-time applications. But the hype Erlang is getting in the last couple of years is mostly for wrong reasons.

Having said that, its a language every programmer should look into at least once – its refreshing. And it might just be the perfect language that fits your needs.

What doesn’t Erlang have? It has its own Virtual Machine that it runs on. It is ridiculously simple to write distributed applications, with its message-passing style concurrency. It has its own database. It supports hot code swapping without even restarting the servers, and its already been proven in some telecom applications that need very high uptime. Hot code swapping is still a nightmare even in a supposedly mature language like Java which is targeted at building web applications – that have high availability and scalability.

However there are certain things that either suck or are not as convincing about Erlang.

1. Today’s mainstream developers who are used to C or Java like syntax wont find its Prolog-like syntax too friendly. Unless you started programming since the 80′s & 90′s and are used to languages of similar syntax, it will take quite some time before you get comfortable with Erlang’s weird syntax. I never felt too comfortable with the syntax.

2. While the core language itself is small and easy to learn, the libraries within the language are inconsistent, incomplete and poorly documented. I posted a couple of questions in the forums regarding how to use a library, and usually the answers would be “Don’t use that library, use the other one”. (Oh yeah, kind of like the Java JDK Logging. Please use Commons Logging.)

3. Only a few people have written production level codes and you rarely get to hear from them. All you hear from is Erlang enthusiasts, who are hyping it as the next big thing, but haven’t done more than a few labs from Armstrong book.

4. I can’t imagine how you can organize large code-bases in Erlang or even work as team, and this doesn’t feel right to any OO programmer.

5. Most of the performance matrices are one-sided, and are performed by people who have an interest in Erlang. I would love to see some independent analysis.

6. Its support for web-development is very primitive. With web frameworks like rails and grails, there is a lot of serious work for Erlang if it ever intends to go to that market.

7. Did I talk about Strings in Erlang? IO speed?

I know weaknesses aren’t as important as the strengths of a language. Erlang has it own expertise, its syntax structure, and its own audience. But the flaws of Erlang might just turn away a new programmer, even before he gets to its beauty.

If you are writing a web crawler, Erlang may very well be your choice. If you want to write a client-server, where the client makes a large no of requests, and you want to spawn concurrent processes to process the requests, Erlang could be your choice. If you want to write a Distributed Hash Table, Erlang could be your choice. Or if you are writing a video streaming server or doing system integration or writing any system utility. But a regular developer (building a CRUD application on top of a database, right? ) doesn’t have much to do with Erlang as yet. Secondly, even if you are working on those highly scalable, reliable and concrurrent systems, people have a hard time accepting Erlang along with its flaws.

The industry has a definite space for Erlang, currently and more so in future as we deal with more and more users, more data, and more forms of distribution. If not for Erlang exactly, then for an improved version of Erlang. It isn’t here to be the next Java, but to solve out the problems that Java couldn’t do smoothly in over a decade (despite having such a great community).

Erlang is going from an underestimated to an overhyped language. I wish it can convert the hype and raw interest in Erlang into something meaningful. How about a modern variation of Erlang on the Erlang’s virtual machine. Is it too late?